ITERATED LOCAL LEAST SQUARES MICROARRAY MISSING VALUE IMPUTATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microarray gene expression data often contains multiple missing values due to various reasons. However, most of gene expression data analysis algorithms require complete expression data. Therefore, accurate estimation of the missing values is critical to further data analysis. In this paper, an Iterated Local Least Squares Imputation (ILLSimpute) method is proposed for estimating missing values. Two unique features of ILLSimpute method are: ILLSimpute method does not fix a common number of coherent genes for target genes for estimation purpose, but defines coherent genes as those within a distance threshold to the target genes. Secondly, in ILLSimpute method, estimated values in one iteration are used for missing value estimation in the next iteration and the method terminates after certain iterations or the imputed values converge. Experimental results on six real microarray datasets showed that ILLSimpute method performed at least as well as, and most of the time much better than, five most recent imputation methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it