Physiological and pathophysiological role of magnesium in the cardiovascular system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attention is growing for a potential role of magnesium in the pathoetiology of cardiovascular disease. Magnesium modulates mechanical, electrical and structural functions of cardiac and vascular cells, and small changes in extracellular magnesium levels and/or intracellular free magnesium concentration may have significant effects on cardiac excitability and on vascular tone, contractility and reactivity. Thus, magnesium may be important in the physiological regulation of blood pressure whereas alterations in cellular magnesium metabolism could contribute to the pathogenesis of blood pressure elevation. Although most epidemiological and experimental studies support a pathological role for magnesium in the etiology and development of hypertension, data from clinical studies have been less convincing. Furthermore, the therapeutic value of magnesium in the management of essential hypertension is unclear. The present review discusses the molecular, biochemical, physiological and pharmacological roles of magnesium in the regulation of vascular function and blood pressure and introduces novel concepts relating to magnesium as a second messenger in intracellular signaling in cardiovascular cells. In addition, alterations in magnesium regulation in experimental and clinical hypertension and the potential antihypertensive therapeutic effects of magnesium are addressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it