MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980645347 · doi:10.1029/2000jb900023

Evidence for local variations in the depth to the 410 km discontinuity beneath Albuquerque, New Mexico

2000· article· en· W1980645347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Gurrola, J. B. Minster

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAdvanced Research Projects AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyDiscontinuity (linguistics)Transition zoneSeismologyRiftTectonicsGeomorphologyGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We stack data from the three‐component broadband seismic stations at Piñon Flat, California (PFO); Ontario, Canada (RSON); and Albuquerque, New Mexico (ANMO) using the velocity spectrum stacking method. By doing so, we estimate the transition zone thickness (TZT) beneath southern California and Ontario to be 236 and 263 km, respectively. Beneath ANMO we‐find a bimodal distribution in our estimates of the TZT. The transition zone west of ANMO appears to be similar in thickness to that beneath PFO (232 km). The transition zone east of ANMO is 253 km, similar to that estimated for RSON. We conclude that surface tectonics across the Rio Grande Rift are closely related to the transition zone structure beneath it and that the rift, which separates the region of active tectonism from the stable High Plains of eastern New Mexico, is also associated with a boundary in transition zone structure. Most of this 20 km change in TZT appears to be due to topography on the 410 km discontinuity. This implies that beneath New Mexico, lateral variations in temperature do not cross the transition zone and that the 410 km discontinuity reflects surface tectonics more closely than does the 660 km discontinuity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207