Overexpression of l-Isoaspartate O-Methyltransferase in Escherichia coli Increases Heat Shock Survival by a Mechanism Independent of Methyltransferase Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over time and under stressing conditions proteins are susceptible to a variety of spontaneous covalent modifications. One of the more commonly occurring types of protein damage is deamidation; the conversion of asparagines into aspartyls and isoaspartyls. The physiological significance of isoaspartyl formation is emphasized by the presence of the conserved enzyme L-isoaspartyl O-methyltransferase (PIMT), whose physiological function appears to be in preventing the accumulation of deamidated proteins. Seemingly consistent with a repair function, overexpression of PIMT in Drosophila melanogaster extends lifespan under conditions expected to contribute to protein damage. Based on structural information and sequence homology we have created mutants of residues proposed to be involved in co-factor binding in Escherichia coli PIMT. Both mutants retain S-adenosyl L-methionine binding capabilities but demonstrate dramatically reduced kinetic capabilities, perhaps suggestive of catalytic roles beyond co-factor binding. As anticipated, overexpression of the wild type enzyme in E. coli results in bacteria with increased tolerance to thermal stress. Surprisingly, even greater levels of heat tolerance were observed with overexpression of the inactive PIMT mutants. The increased survival capabilities observed with overexpression of PIMT in E. coli, and possibly in Drosophila, are not due to increased isoaspartyl repair capabilities but rather a temperature-independent induction of the heat shock system as a result of overexpression of a misfolding-prone protein. An alternate hypothesis as to the physiological substrate and function of L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".