MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980687278 · doi:10.1107/s0907444903028427

Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of native and selenomethionine class I tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from<i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>

2004· article· en· W1980687278 on OpenAlexaff
B. Liotard, J. Sygusch

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAldolase ACrystallizationChemistryOrthorhombic crystal systemDihydroxyacetone phosphateBiochemistryCleavage (geology)StereochemistryCrystallographyPhosphateBiologyEnzymeCrystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.40) is situated at the branching of the tagatose-6-phosphate and Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (glycolysis) metabolic pathways, where it catalyzes the reversible cleavage of tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate. The recombinant protein from Streptococcus pyogenes was overexpressed in Escherichia coli in its native and selenomethionine-derivative forms and purified using ion-exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Orthorhombic crystals suitable for structural analysis were obtained by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method for both isoforms. The crystals belong to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 63.7, b = 108.1, c = 238.7 A for the native form and a = 64.1, b = 108.3, c = 239.8 A for the selenomethionine derivative. The asymmetric unit contains four protomers, corresponding to a crystal volume per protein weight (V(M)) of 2.8 A(3) Da(-1) and a solvent content of 56% by volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207