MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980688912 · doi:10.3166/jds.12.11-20

Optional Preventive Replacement Policy for Two-Component System

2003· article· en· W1980688912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Decision System · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComponent (thermodynamics)Preventive maintenanceComputer scienceFailure rateSeries (stratigraphy)Mathematical optimizationOperations researchReliability engineeringMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops an optional replacement policy for the maintenance of two non-identical components connected in series configuration. In this policy, each component is replaced correctively whenever it fails and preventively only if its age reaches or exceeds a preventive replacement age T when the other component fails. Mathematical model is established to evaluate the expected maintenance cost per unit of time over an infinite horizon for a special case when one of the two components has an increasing failure rate whereas the second component has a constant failure rate. Optimal policy is derived from the mathematical model and validated using a simulation model. The simulation model is then extended to a general case when the two components have increasing failure rates. Numerical examples are carried out to illustrate the special and the general cases of the considered optional replacement policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it