MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980691722 · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01098-7

Management of myopic astigmatism with phakic intraocular lens implantation

2002· article· en· W1980691722 on OpenAlexaff
Howard V. Gimbel, Steven L. Ziémba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsGimbel Eye Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratomileusisMedicinePhakic intraocular lensOphthalmologyAstigmatismIntraocular lensCorneaLens (geology)Visual acuityOptometryRefractive errorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 48-year-old woman presented with a manifest refraction of -9.25 -2.25 x 98 that resulted in a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20(-2) in the right eye. She was contact lens intolerant but was not a good candidate for laser in situ keratomileusis because of a thin cornea. A phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) with a toric optic was implanted with no operative complications. One day after surgery, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/15. Five months postoperatively, the UCVA in the operated eye was 20/15 with a manifest refraction of +0.25 -0.25 x 60 and a BCVA of 20/15. No changes to the crystalline lens or anterior lens capsule were seen. This is the first report of implantation of a toric phakic IOL in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207