MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980691722 · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01098-7

Management of myopic astigmatism with phakic intraocular lens implantation

2002· article· en· W1980691722 on OpenAlexaff
Howard V. Gimbel, Steven L. Ziémba

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsGimbel Eye Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratomileusisMedicinePhakic intraocular lensOphthalmologyAstigmatismIntraocular lensCorneaLens (geology)Visual acuityOptometryRefractive errorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 48-year-old woman presented with a manifest refraction of -9.25 -2.25 x 98 that resulted in a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20(-2) in the right eye. She was contact lens intolerant but was not a good candidate for laser in situ keratomileusis because of a thin cornea. A phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) with a toric optic was implanted with no operative complications. One day after surgery, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/15. Five months postoperatively, the UCVA in the operated eye was 20/15 with a manifest refraction of +0.25 -0.25 x 60 and a BCVA of 20/15. No changes to the crystalline lens or anterior lens capsule were seen. This is the first report of implantation of a toric phakic IOL in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207