Neisseria meningitidis Carriage during an Outbreak of Serogroup C Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During 2001, an outbreak of serogroup C meningococcal disease led to immunization of individuals aged 13-29 years in Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada. This study addresses the distribution of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in this population and the implications of that distribution for the targeting of the immunization campaign. Pharyngeal swabs were obtained at immunization from 2004 people. Colonies were identified and serogrouped using standard agglutination methods and by PCR. Isolates were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The prevalence of N. meningitidis carriage was 153 carriers per 2004 subjects (7.6%; 95% confidence interval, 6.5%-8.9%). Only 6 (4%) of the isolates from these carriers were found to be serogroup C by agglutination or PCR testing, and all of these were from individuals within the age group targeted for immunization. Only 1 of these 6 isolates was found to be identical to the outbreak strain by PFGE. The observation that a virulent strain is not circulating widely suggests the possibility of low background immunity in the population at risk and emphasizes the importance of vaccination in controlling epidemic group C meningococcal disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".