[ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] Evidence for an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole in the Globular Cluster M15. I. STIS Spectroscopy and WFPC2 Photometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this series of two papers we describe a project with STIS on HST to measure the line-of-sight velocities of stars in the central few arcsec of the dense globular cluster M15. This first paper focuses on the observations and reduction of the data. We `scanned' the central region of M15 spectroscopically by consecutively placing an 0.1 arcsec slit at 18 adjacent positions. Careful and complicated data reduction and analysis were required. The spectral pixel size exceeds the velocity dispersion of M15, which puts the project at the limit of what is feasible with STIS. We applied corrections for the following effects: drifts in the STIS wavelength scale during an HST orbit; the orbital velocity component of HST along the line-of-sight to the cluster, and its variations during the HST orbit; and the apparent wavelength shift that is perceived for a star that is not centered in the slit. To make these corrections we present a detailed study of the HST/STIS point-spread function and line-spread function. We also present a catalog with positions and U, B and V magnitudes of 31,983 stars in M15, created from existing HST/WFPC2 data. We extract 19,200 one-dimensional spectra from the STIS data, each for a different position in M15, and each with a velocity scale accurate to better than 2.5 km/s. We develop an algorithm that co-adds the spectra for individual apertures and use it to extract spectra of individual stars with minimum blending and maximum S/N. In Paper II we use these spectra to extract the line-of-sight velocities of individual stars. The velocities constrain the central structure, dynamics and mass distribution of the cluster, and provide evidence for the existence of an intermediate-mass black hole in the center of the cluster.[ABRIDGED]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".