MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980707694 · doi:10.1086/344583

[ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] Evidence for an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole in the Globular Cluster M15. I. STIS Spectroscopy and WFPC2 Photometry

2002· article· en· W1980707694 on OpenAlexaff
Roeland P. van der Marel, Joris Gerssen, Puragra Guhathakurta, R. C. Peterson, Karl Gebhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterAstrophysicsAstronomyPhotometry (optics)Space Telescope Imaging SpectrographAdvanced Camera for SurveysStarsStar clusterBlack hole (networking)Hubble space telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this series of two papers, we describe a project with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) on the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) to measure the line-of-sight velocities of stars in the central few arcseconds of the dense globular cluster M15. The main goal of this project is to search for the possible presence of an intermediate-mass central black hole. This first paper focuses on the observations and reduction of the data. We "scanned" the central region of M15 spectroscopically by consecutively placing the 0 1 HST /STIS slit at 18 adjacent positions. The spectral pixel size exceeds the velocity dispersion of M15. This puts the project at the limit of what is feasible with STIS, and exceedingly careful and complicated data reduction and analysis were required. We applied corrections for the following effects: drifts in the STIS wavelength scale during an HST orbit; the orbital velocity component of HST along the line of sight to the cluster, and its variations during the HST orbit; and the apparent wavelength shift that is perceived for a star that is not centered in the slit. The latter correction is particularly complicated and requires many pieces of information: (1) the positions and magnitudes of all the stars near the center of M15; (2) accurate positionings of the STIS slits during the observations; (3) and the HST /STIS point-spread function (PSF) and line-spread function (LSF). To address the first issue we created a stellar catalog of M15 from the existing HST /WFPC2 data discussed previously by Guhathakurta et al., but with an improved astrometric and photometric calibration. The catalog is distributed electronically as part of this paper. It contains 31,983 stars with their positions and U , B , and V magnitudes. To address the second issue, we model the observed intensity profiles along the STIS slits to determine the slit positionings to 0 007 accuracy in each coordinate. To address the third issue, we obtained observations of a bright field star to which we fitted multi-Gaussian PSF and LSF models. Upon reduction of the M15 spectroscopy we ultimately obtain 19,200 one-dimensional STIS spectra, each for a different aperture position in M15, with a velocity scale accurate to better than 2.5 km s -1 . We develop an algorithm that co-adds the spectra for individual apertures and use it to extract spectra of individual stars with minimum blending and maximum signal-to-noise ratio. In Paper II we use these spectra to extract reliable line-of-sight velocities for 64 stars, half of which reside within R = 2 4 from the cluster center. These velocities constrain the central structure, dynamics, and mass distribution of the cluster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207