Zonal organization of the vestibulocerebellum in pigeons (<i>Columba livia</i>): I. Climbing fiber input to the flocculus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies in pigeons have shown that the neurons in the medial column of the inferior olive respond best to patterns of optic flow resulting from self-rotation. With respect to the axis of rotation, there are two functional groups: rVA neurons prefer rotation about the vertical axis, whereas rH45 neurons respond best to rotation about an horizontal axis oriented at 45 degrees ipsilateral azimuth. The rVA and rH45 neurons are located in the caudal and rostral margins of the medial column, respectively. These olivary neurons project as climbing fibers to the contralateral flocculus. In this study, injections of anterograde tracers into the medial column were used to investigate the zonal organization of the climbing fiber input to the flocculus of pigeons. Iontophoretic injections of either cholera toxin subunit-B or biotinylated dextrin amine were made into the medial column of the inferior olive at locations responsive to rVA or rH45 rotational optic flow. Anterogradely labeled climbing fibers in the flocculus showed a clear zonal organization. There were four parasagittal bands spanning both folia IXcd and X consisting of two rVA zones interdigitated with two rH45 zones. These findings are compared with the zonal organization of the flocculus in mammalian species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".