MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980778382 · doi:10.1021/ie9007002

Kinetics of Hydrogen Uptake and Release from Heteroaromatic Compounds for Hydrogen Storage

2009· article· en· W1980778382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDehydrogenationCarbazoleCatalysisKineticsHydrogen storageSelectivityHydrogenAdsorptionChemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhotochemistryInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetics of hydrogen uptake by N -ethylcarbazole and carbazole, and the kinetics of H 2 release from their hydrogenated products, is reported. The hydrogenation of N -ethylcarbazole at 130−150 °C on Ru was well described by a network of first-order stepwise hydrogenation reactions. The hydrogenation of N -ethylcarbazole was significantly faster than the hydrogenation of carbazole, and in both cases, >95% selectivity to the completely hydrogenated products, dodecahydro- N -ethylcarbazole and dodecahydrocarbazole, was achieved. The dehydrogenation of dodecahydro- N -ethylcarbazole at 101 kPa and 150−170 °C, proceeded to 100% conversion of the reactant over a Pd catalyst within 1 h. However, only 69% of the stored H 2 was recovered due to a low selectivity to N -ethylcarbazole. In the case of dodecahydrocarbazole dehydrogenation at 101 kPa and 170 °C over the same Pd catalyst, 28% H 2 recovery was obtained due to the strong adsorption of the product carbazole on the catalyst surface that also resulted in a slower rate of dodecahydrocarbazole dehydrogenation compared to dodecahydro- N -ethylcarbazole.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it