Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article we introduce a new method of mitigating the problem of long wait times for low-priority customers in a two-class queuing system. To this end, we allow class 1 customers to be upgraded to class 2 after they have been in queue for some time. We assume that there are ci servers at station i, i=1, 2. The servers at station 1 are flexible in the sense that they can work at either station, whereas the servers at station 2 are dedicated. Holding costs at rate hi are accrued per customer per unit time at station i, i=1, 2. This study yields several surprising results. First, we show that stability analysis requires a condition on the order of the service rates. This is unexpected since no such condition is required when the system does not have upgrades. This condition continues to play a role when control is considered. We provide structural results that include a c-μ rule when an inequality holds and a threshold policy when the inequality is reversed. A numerical study verifies that the optimal control policy significantly reduces holding costs over the policy that assigns the flexible server to station 1. At the same time, in most cases the optimal control policy reduces waiting times of both customer classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".