MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980829020 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0b013e31818e376a

Right pneumonectomy syndrome presenting as a cardiac arrest in a two-year-old

2009· article· en· W1980829020 on OpenAlexaff
Reshma Amin, Vinay Joshi, Peter N. Cox

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumonectomyMediastinal ShiftComplicationSurgeryBronchusRight Main BronchusAirwayBronchoscopyLungRespiratory diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonectomy syndrome is a rare complication after pneumonectomy with variable onset and presentation. It is characterized by extrinsic airway compression secondary to mediastinal shift. As far as we are aware, we are reporting the first pediatric case of pneumonectomy syndrome presenting as a cardio-pulmonary arrest. PATIENT AND INTERVENTION: A two-year-old boy presented with a cardiac arrest 8 months after his pneumonectomy. He failed extubation twice. A flexible bronchoscopy was then performed which revealed external compression of the left mainstem bronchus. He underwent surgical correction with a prosthetic, thoracic implant. RESULT: The patient's trachea was subsequently extubated to room air on postoperative day 1. He remains clinically stable at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Postpneumonectomy syndrome is a rare but serious complication after pneumonectomy. If the airway compression occurs in conjunction with compromised vena caval return, cardio-pulmonary arrest can occur. Therefore, timely diagnosis and early intervention is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesFrench-language works237,207