Effect of Radiation on Skin Expansion and Skin Flap Viability in Pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of radiation treatment both on skin tissue expansion with the chronic inflation of subcutaneous expanders and on skin flap viability in surgically delayed and expanded skin in the pig. One flank in each of six pigs (initially weighing 17 +/- 1.8 kg) was randomly assigned for radiation treatment, and the contralateral flank served as a nonirradiated control. Three mirror-image, 8 x 10 cm, rectangular templates were marked on each flank; these templates were randomly assigned to the construction of a delayed skin flap (group A), a skin flap raised on expanded skin (group B), or a skin flap raised on expanded skin with a capsulectomy before flap surgery (group C). Radiation treatment was performed using sequential radiation with three fractions per week (810 cGy/fraction) for 2 weeks, with a total dose of 4,860 cGy. Twelve weeks after radiation treatment, skin expanders (8 x 10 cm) were installed subcutaneously in the locations assigned for skin expansion. Skin expansion by the inflation of subcutaneous skin expanders with saline twice weekly was started 8 weeks later and lasted for 3 weeks. Two weeks after surgical delay and the last skin expansion, 8 x 20 cm skin flaps were raised on the locations assigned for delayed skin flaps, expanded skin flaps, and expanded skin flaps with a capsulectomy. Skin flap viability was assessed 24 hours later using a fluorescein dye-staining technique. Skin expansion by the inflation of subcutaneous expanders with saline was slower (p < 0.05) in the radiated skin (39 +/- 6 ml/filling) than in the nonirradiated control skin (51 +/- 6 ml/filling). Radiation reduced the overall area of expanded skin by 23 percent (p < 0.05) compared with the control. Radiation treatment also reduced skin viability by 36 percent (p < 0.05) in the delayed skin flaps, 27 percent (p = 0.10) in the expanded skin flaps, and 36 percent (p < 0.05) in the expanded skin flaps with a capsulectomy when compared with their contralateral, nonirradiated controls. There were no significant differences in skin viability among these three types of skin flaps within the radiated and nonirradiated groups. Taken together, these observations indicate that radiation treatment reduced the effectiveness of the surgical delay procedure, the amount of subcutaneous skin expansion (by an increase in skin area), and skin flap viability. However, a capsulectomy alone did not affect the viability of skin flaps raised on expanded skin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".