Xin‐deficient mice display myopathy, impaired contractility, attenuated muscle repair and altered satellite cell functionality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Xin is an F-actin-binding protein expressed during development of cardiac and skeletal muscle. We used Xin-/- mice to determine the impact of Xin deficiency on different aspects of skeletal muscle health, including functionality and regeneration. METHODS: Xin-/- skeletal muscles and their satellite cell (SC) population were investigated for the presence of myopathic changes by a series of histological and immunofluorescent stains on resting uninjured muscles. To further understand the effect of Xin loss on muscle health and its SCs, we studied SCs responses following cardiotoxin-induced muscle injury. Functional data were determined using in situ muscle stimulation protocol. RESULTS: Compared to age-matched wild-type (WT), Xin-/- muscles exhibited generalized myopathy and increased fatigability with a significantly decreased force recovery post-fatiguing contractions. Muscle regeneration was attenuated in Xin-/- mice. This impaired regeneration prompted an investigation into SC content and functionality. Although SC content was not different, significantly more activated SCs were present in Xin-/- vs. WT muscles. Primary Xin-/- myoblasts displayed significant reductions (approx. 50%) in proliferative capacity vs. WT; a finding corroborated by significantly decreased MyoD-positive nuclei in 3 days post-injury Xin-/- muscle vs. WT. As more activated SCs did not translate to more proliferating myoblasts, we investigated whether Xin-/- SCs displayed an exaggerated loss by apoptosis. More apoptotic SCs (TUNEL+/Pax7+) were present in Xin-/- muscle vs. WT. Furthermore, more Xin-/- myoblasts were expressing nuclear caspase-3 compared to WT at 3 days post-injury. CONCLUSION: Xin deficiency leads to a myopathic condition characterized by increased muscle fatigability, impaired regeneration and SC dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".