MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980859258 · doi:10.2118/84963-pa

Occurrence, Prediction, and Prevention of Zinc Sulfide Scale Within Gulf Coast and North Sea High-Temperature and High-Salinity Fields

2003· article· en· W1980859258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Facilities · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfideHydrogen sulfideZincDissolutionSulfateCarbonateZinc sulfideDeposition (geology)Environmental scienceFossil fuelAcid gasStress corrosion crackingProduced waterMetallurgyCorrosionSulfurChemistryGeologyEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementSedimentMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In oil and gas production operations, precipitation of mineral scales causes many problems, such as formation damage, production losses, increased workovers in both producers and injectors, poor injection-water quality, and equipment failures caused by underdeposit corrosion. The most common mineral scales are sulfate- and carbonate-based minerals. However, scale problems are not limited to these minerals, and there recently have been reports of unusual scale types, such as zinc and lead sulfide. This paper focuses on zinc sulfide scale that has been found in several fields along the Gulf Coast of the U.S.A. and in fields within the North Sea Basin. Scale deposition has caused significant pressure and rate reductions in high-temperature and high-rate gas, condensate, and black oil wells. After acid washes to remove zinc sulfide scale (and other acid-soluble solids), production rates and flowing tubing pressures returned to previous levels, but new scale deposits formed in many wells and retreatments were required. Topside process equipment, most noticeably low-pressure separators and hydrocyclones, were observed to suffer reductions in performance owing to zinc sulfide scale deposition. In addition, there are significant risks associated with acid treatments in high-temperature, high-pressure (HT/HP) gas wells in corrosivity of the acid at high temperatures (general corrosion, sulfide stress cracking, and chloride stress cracking) and in safety (hydrogen sulfide generation by acid dissolution of zinc sulfide plus high-pressure pumping). One possible method for preventing production declines and reducing the need for HT/HP acid jobs is to use scale inhibitors or chelating agents to prevent the formation of zinc sulfide scale. The relative effectiveness of eight scale-inhibitor chemistries and two chelating agents in preventing formation of zinc sulfide scale has been determined. The required scale-inhibitor concentrations are significantly higher than those needed for common sulfate and carbonate scales. For chelating agents, it is possible to prevent the formation of zinc sulfide scale when the required concentrations are proportional to the zinc ion concentration in the scaling brine. This paper outlines the testing methods used for chemical screening and prediction so that assessment of the potential problem within fields can be assessed during appraisal, before production commences, making a method of managing the risk available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it