A nonradioactive method for detecting phosphates and polyphosphates separated by PAGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonradioactive polyphosphate (poly(P); (PO(3) (-))(n)) species resolved by PAGE can be detected by hydrolytic degradation of the polyphosphates into orthophosphates (P(i)) with a 5 M HCl solution saturated with NaCl, followed by staining the P(i) degradation products in a 1 M HCl solution of 0.25% w/v methyl green and 1% w/v ammonium molybdate. This method detects down to 0.5 nmol of phosphate as P(i), linear poly(P) (condensed phosphate), pyrophosphate (P(2)O(7) (4) (-)), or cyclic trimetaphosphate ion (P(3)O(9))(3) (-) species. This method improves the current method of staining linear poly(P) longer than four phosphate units with Toludine blue-O after PAGE. This study also shows that Stains-All can visualize resolved linear poly(P) shorter than those visualized by Toluidine blue-O. It is hoped that this sequential hydrolytic degradation and phosphate visualization method for detecting ortho-, linear, and cyclic poly(P) species will be a useful tool, as poly(P) are being discovered in a wide variety of biological systems, and their biochemical roles are still largely unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".