MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980904022 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/010

CAST constraints on the axion-electron coupling

2013· article· en· W1980904022 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Barth, А. С. Белов, B. Beltrán, H. Bräuninger, J. M. Carmona, J. I. Collar, T. Dafní, M. Davenport, L. Di Lella, C. Eleftheriadis, J. Englhauser, G. Fanourakis, E. Ferrer-Ribas, H. Fischer, J. Franz, P. Friedrich, J. Galán, José Miguel Alonso Garcia, T. Geralis, I. Giomataris, S. Gninenko, H. Gómez, M. D. Hasinoff, F. H. Heinsius, D. H. H. Hoffmann, I.G. Irastorza, J. Jacoby, K. Jakovčić, Woosik Kang, K. Königsmann, R. Kotthaus, K. Kousouris, M. Krčmar, M. Kuster, B. Lakić, A. Liolios, A. Ljubičić, G. Lutz, G. Luzón, D W Miller, T. Papaevangelou, M. J. Pivovaroff, Georg G. Raffelt, Javier Redondo, H. Riege, Alejandro Soto Rodríguez, J. Ruz, I. Savvidis, Yannis K. Semertzidis, L. Stewart, K. van Bibber, J. D. Vieira, J.A. Villar, Julia K. Vogel, L. Walckiers, K. Zioutas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAxionPhysicsYukawa potentialParticle physicsElectronBremsstrahlungCoupling (piping)PhotonCompton scatteringDark matterNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In non-hadronic axion models, which have a tree-level axion-electron interaction, the Sun produces a strong axion flux by bremsstrahlung, Compton scattering, and axio-recombination, the "BCA processes." Based on a new calculation of this flux, including for the first time axio-recombination, we derive limits on the axion-electron Yukawa coupling g_ae and axion-photon interaction strength g_ag using the CAST phase-I data (vacuum phase). For m_a < 10 meV/c2 we find g_ag x g_ae< 8.1 x 10^-23 GeV^-1 at 95% CL. We stress that a next-generation axion helioscope such as the proposed IAXO could push this sensitivity into a range beyond stellar energy-loss limits and test the hypothesis that white-dwarf cooling is dominated by axion emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207