Processus de transformation chez un groupe de personnes cadiaques suivies en ergothérapie pour une modification de leur équilibre du fonctionnement occupationnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformative learning is a process of adaptation that allows for profound personal change in occupational therapy clients. This process is provoked by a triggering factor, such as illness, which results in a critical reflection on values, beliefs, feelings and personal knowledge associated with the object of change (Mezirow, 1991). As part of an objective aimed at modifying the balance of occupation, nine participants were interviewed over a 6 month period to explore their processes of change. Eight concepts related to the objective of change of the balance of occupation emerged from an inductive data analysis process (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). The perception of work was interpreted by the authors as having undergone the most significant sense of transformation amongst the participants. Two other perceptions, 1) the definition of self and 2) the concept of health emerged as new elements essential to the modification of the balance of occupation. The transformation process linked to these eight concepts revealed a specific structure and sequence. The results highlight the primary role of critical reflection amongst occupational therapy clients and underline the importance of deconstructing common values and beliefs which could slow down the process of change. Moreover, the development of new values and beliefs is a vehicle for change in occupational therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".