MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980923803 · doi:10.1021/jf051369g

Stabilizing Behavior of Soy Soluble Polysaccharide or High Methoxyl Pectin in Soy Protein Isolate Emulsions at Low pH

2006· article· en· W1980923803 on OpenAlexaff
M Haghighian Roudsari, Akihiro Nakamura, A.K. Smith, Milena Corredig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCargill
KeywordsPectinChemistrySoy proteinPolysaccharideCreamingFlocculationEmulsionChromatographyPea proteinFood scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability of emulsions prepared with soy protein isolates was investigated as a function of pH in the presence of two negatively charged polysaccharides: high methoxyl pectin (HMP) and soy soluble polysaccharide (SSPS). Both polysaccharides are composed of a backbone which contains galacturonic acid but, when added to soy protein isolate-stabilized emulsions, SSPS showed a different behavior than that of HMP. At neutral pH and above a critical concentration of stabilizer (0.05%), HMP caused flocculation of the emulsion droplets via a depletion mechanism. On the other hand, the emulsions containing a similar amount of SSPS did not show creaming or flocculation. At acidic pH (<4.0) the addition of pectin caused extensive droplet aggregation, while no aggregation was observed with the addition of SSPS. The differences in the stabilization behavior between the two polysaccharides can be attributed to their differences in charge, neutral sugars side chains, and molecular weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207