MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced settling of fine silica by direct AC electrocoagulation

2013· article· en· W1980926449 on OpenAlexafffund
Roy O. Ifill, Thomas H. Etsell

Bibliographic record

VenueMineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section C · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSettlingElectrocoagulationFlocculationAluminiumSettling timeSuspension (topology)Materials scienceAqueous solutionPrecipitationTailingsChemistryMineralogyPulp and paper industryChemical engineeringMetallurgyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground silica (d50, 20 μm) was treated as an aqueous suspension of 5·0 wt-% solids by alternating current electrocoagulation (AC/EC) in the direct mode. The initial settling rate increased linearly by 0·054 m h−1 per minute of AC/EC, with the maximum (>7·32 m h−1) occurring at t>120 min of AC/EC. Up to 75 min, floc size controlled the initial settling rate; at longer times, floc morphology took control.Aluminium released from the electrodes was adsorbed as it entered the pulp, and could be viewed as having been metered in continuously. Aluminium precipitation became prominent after ∼75 min of AC/EC time and was not deleterious to the enhancement of settling behaviour.Two years after its preparation, electrocoagulated silica was demonstrated to be an effective coagulant for as-received silica and oil sands fluid fine tailings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section CSame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207