MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980929470 · doi:10.1115/ht2003-47315

A Sensitivity Study of NOx Emission to the Change in the Input Variables of a FGR Industrial Furnace

2003· article· en· W1980929470 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Jiang, C. Zhang, Jin Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxCombustionFlue gasTurbulenceInletMechanicsChemistryEnvironmental scienceThermodynamicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary study has shown that the flue gas recirculation (FGR) is one of the effective ways to reduce the Nitric Oxides (NOx) emission in industrial furnaces. The research reported in this paper concentrates mainly on the development of dynamic models suitable for on-line and real-time feedback control to reduce the NOx emission in industrial furnaces with FGR. To construct an appropriate dynamic model, the relationship between the NOx emission and the furnace input variables, such as the inlet combustion air mass flow rate, inlet combustion air temperature, and the pressure head of the FGR fan, has been investigated. A moment closure method with the assumed β probability density function (PDF) for the mixture fraction is used to model the turbulent non-premixed combustion process in the furnace. The combustion model is derived based on the assumption of instantaneous full chemical equilibrium. The discrete transfer radiation model is chosen as the radiation heat transfer model, and the weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model is used to calculate the absorption coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207