MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980940419 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277734

Correlated Keyhole MIMO Channels: SNR and Outage Capacity Distributions

2006· article· en· W1980940419 on OpenAlexaff
Georgy Levin, Sergey Loyka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOChannel capacityKeyholeGaussianSpatial correlationMeasure (data warehouse)MathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Topology (electrical circuits)Statistical physicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keyhole MIMO channels, which were predicted theoretically and also observed experimentally, have recently received significant attention as they may appear in some practically-important propagation scenarios. This paper concentrates on the capacity study of such channels. Closed-form expressions for the instantaneous SNR and outage capacity distributions of a spatially correlated keyhole MIMO channel are given. The case of non-singular correlation matrices with distinct eigenvalues is considered in detail. When the numbers of Tx and Rx antennas are both large, the asymptotic outage capacity distribution of the keyhole channel is Gaussian under general conditions on the correlation (the average SNR affects the mean and the correlation affects the variance). The Gaussian approximation is accurate already for a reasonably small number of antennas (2times2). Based on the asymptotic capacity analysis, a full ordering scalar measure of MIMO channel correlation and power imbalance is introduced. Using this measure, we show analytically that the outage capacity at low outage probabilities decreases with correlation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207