MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980946108 · doi:10.7202/1014982ar

L’utilisation des Tic par les PME dans les régions rurales francophones du sud-ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse : étude exploratoire

2013· article· fr· W1980946108 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Dianne Blinn, Yalla Sangaré

Bibliographic record

VenuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennes · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité Sainte-Anne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À l’instar de la plupart des régions rurales du Canada atlantique, le sud-ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse fait face à des défis économiques importants. Au-delà du déclin démographique, il y a consensus pour dire que cette région doit progressivement passer d’une économie basée sur l’exploitation des matières premières et des ressources naturelles à une économie basée sur les services et le savoir. Dans quelles mesures les francophones du sud-ouest de la Nouvelle-Écosse s’adaptent-ils aux changements structurels dans l’environnement économique? L’objet de cet article est de voir quelle utilisation les entreprises francophones de cette région font des technologies de l’information et de la communication (Tic) à partir d’un sondage réalisé auprès des dirigeants et entrepreneurs. La principale conclusion de cette étude est que les entreprises ont pris le virage des Tic, mais elles ne les utilisent pas à leur plein potentiel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207