MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980950529 · doi:10.1080/15216540211474

Oxalate, Germins, and Higher‐Plant Pathogens

2002· review· en· W1980950529 on OpenAlexaff
B. G. Lane

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxalateHydrogen peroxideCell wallProteasesChemistryBiochemistryBiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earlier surveys (1, B. G. Lane. [1991] FASEB J. 5, 2983-2901; 2, B. G. Lane. [1994] FASEB J. 8, 294-301) helped to uproot entrenched views of plant oxalate as a static substance. It is now recognized that oxalate oxidases (OXOs) found in the "true cereals" (barley, maize, oat, rice, rye, wheat), the so-called germin OXOs (G-OXOs), or simply germins, are involved in cereal defence responses to invasion by fungal pathogens and that they show promise of being valuable agents of plant defence in dicotyledons, where they are not found naturally. G-OXOs have very peculiar properties: (a) their water-soluble oligomeric structures and enzymic activity are stable during SDS-PAGE and nitrocellulose blotting, (b) their undenatured water-soluble forms are refractory to the action of broad-specificity proteases, (c) their water-insoluble forms occur abundantly (approximately 50%) in the extracellular matrix (cell walls) of wheat, and probably in varying amounts in the cell walls of other true cereals. Transfer of the wheat G-OXO coding element to dicotyledons has been found, in all cases so far examined, to result in improved resistance to fungal pathogens. The possible nature of the improved resistance is discussed in relation to (a) generation of microcidal concentrations of hydrogen peroxide when the G-OXOs act on oxalate, (b) elicitation of hypersensitive cell death at lower concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, (c) formation of effective barriers against predator penetration by the hydrogen-peroxide-mediated lignification of cell walls, and (d) destruction of oxalate, which is an inhibitor of the hypersensitive response, a strategy of particular importance in the case of ubiquitous predator organisms such as Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, which secrete high concentrations of oxalate as a toxin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207