Empirically predicted <sup>13</sup>C NMR chemical shifts for 8‐hydroxyflavone starting from 7,8,4′‐trihydroxyflavone and from 7,8‐dihydroxyflavone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8-Hydroxyflavone is not found in nature. While the (13)C chemical shifts of 8-hydroxyflavone have been reported previously, the observed (13)C chemical shifts were not assigned. A previously reported empirical predictive tool has been applied in reverse in order to deconvolute the (13)C chemical shifts for 8-hydroxyflavone from each of those of 7,8,4'-trihydroxyflavone and 7,8-dihydroxyflavone together with those of 7-hydroxyflavone, 4'-hydroxyflavone, and flavone. The two sets of calculated (13)C chemical shifts for 8-hydroxyflavone are in good agreement with each other in that the average absolute difference is 0.4 ppm. The previously reported but unassigned (13)C chemical shifts for 8-hydroxyflavone have been assigned by matching them with the averages of the two sets of calculated (13)C chemical shifts for 8-hydroxyflavone such that the minimum average absolute difference is 0.63 ppm. The assigned (13)C chemical shifts of 8-hydroxyflavone may be used, along with the (13)C chemical shifts of the remaining monohydroxyflavones, as part of a predictive tool to rapidly assess the (13)C NMR spectra of C8-hydroxylated flavonoids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".