MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1980995959 · doi:10.1063/1.3061809

Electrochemical corrosion behavior of Nd–Fe–B permanent magnets with modified microstructure

2009· article· en· W1980995959 on OpenAlexaff
W. Q. Liu, Ming Yue, D. T. Zhang, Jianqing ZHANG, Xubo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties of Alloys
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostructureMaterials scienceCorrosionMagnetDielectric spectroscopyMetallurgyElectrolyteElectrochemistryPolarization (electrochemistry)Intergranular corrosionElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polarization curve and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests have been applied to investigate the corrosion kinetics for both spark plasma sintered (SPS) and conventional sintered Nd–Fe–B magnets in different electrolytes. Effect of microstructure modification on the chemical stability of the magnets was discussed. Both magnets exhibit evident passive behavior in alkaline electrolyte but are susceptible to corrosion in weak acid and saline electrolytes. SPS magnets are more corrosion resistant than conventional sintered magnets due to a remarkable microstructure modification formed in the SPS process. Further investigation shows that the unique microstructure in SPS magnets effectively restrains the aggressive intergranular corrosion which takes place along Nd-rich phases in conventional magnets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic Properties of AlloysFrench-language works237,207