MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981005858 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.093

Mechanism of formation of heat stable salts (HSSs) and their roles in further degradation of monoethanolamine during CO2 capture from flue gas streams

2011· article· en· W1981005858 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Teeradet Supap, Raphael Idem, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryFormamideFormic acidAcetamideOxalic acidAmideFormateSuccinic acidDecompositionAcetic acidPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The roles of HSS induced acid products of MEA degradation were evaluated. The results show that formic and acetic acids, formed as a result of MEA oxidation, exist in 2 forms in equilibrium; namely, salts and amides. Specifically, these are formate and acetate, and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)formamide and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)acetamide, respectively. Glycolic acid, also formed due to MEA oxidation, is stable and exists mostly bonded with MEA to produce the glycolate HSS. Its amide is unstable, hydrolyzing back to glycolate and MEA. Oxalic acid was found as a reactive intermediate that mostly decomposed to formic acid, which in turn produced a stable N-(2-hydroxyethyl)formamide. Oxalic acid amide (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)oxamide) could also be formed but its formation was considered a minor route compared with the decomposition route. Succinic acid formed a stable imide (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)succinimide) through an intermediate amide (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)succinamide).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207