An envelope finite-element time-domain method using weighted Laguerre polynomials as temporal expansion functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advantage of the envelope finite-element time-domain (EFETD) method compared to the direct finite-element time-domain (FETD) method is that a much larger time step can be used. Although both approaches use the Newmark–Beta technique for time-stepping, it has recently been demonstrated for the FETD method that weighted Laguerre polynomials may be profitably used as temporal expansion functions, obviating the need for the time-stepping scheme. In this paper, the incorporation of such temporal expansion functions into the EFETD method is proposed and demonstrated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 495–497 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/mop.21389
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it