Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ionic discotic liquid crystals are salts of discotic liquid crystals that may display lyotropic and thermotropic mesomorphism. Columnar structures of π‐π stacking ionic discotic liquid crystals function not only as anisotropic organic semiconductors, similar to their neutral analogues, but they may also efficiently conduct ions. This combination of electronic and ionic conduction is only one of several unique properties that these materials may display, but their systematic investigation has been limited because of their often complex synthesis, purification, and characterization. However, a comprehensive account of existing reports on ionic discotic liquid crystals is not straightforward, despite their relatively small number, because publications are scattered across different areas of research, such as liquid crystals, ionic liquids, and ionic self‐assembly. This review intends to provide a concise but comprehensive overview of the published work on ionic discotic liquid crystals and related compounds and is expected to stimulate further exploration. Highlighted in this review is the mesomorphism of ionic discotic liquid crystals and its dependence on structural changes, which is also the focus of most reported studies. Particular attention was given to the dependence of mesomorphism on the location and types of the charged groups as these are parameters unique to these compounds. Also described are electronic, optical, and other properties of these materials if reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".