MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Partitioning of <sup>127</sup>I and <sup>129</sup>I in an unconfined glaciofluvial aquifer on the Canadian shield

2002· article· en· W1981034712 on OpenAlex
Nicolas Alvarado‐Quiroz, T. Kotzer, G.M. Milton, Ian Clark, D.J. Bottomley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiochimica Acta · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlumeGroundwater rechargeAquiferGroundwaterWater tableBedrockGeologyHydrology (agriculture)IodineChemistryEnvironmental chemistryGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary At AECL – Chalk River Laboratories, Ontario, Canada solid, low-level radioactive wastes from industrial, academic and medical applications have been stored in trenches above unconsolidated sandy glacial tills and permeable very-fine to fine-grained sands overlying crystalline bedrock. The sandy aquifer system drains into a swamp comprised of approximately 3 m of sphagnum peat. A comprehensive field and analytical program, involving measurements of total iodine, 129 I, tritium, 14 C and 13 C/ 12 C ratios in groundwater and geologic materials (sands and peats), was initiated at this site to examine the partitioning of 127 I and 129 I amongst the various reservoirs in this system and the controlling factors. The maximum iodine concentration and 129 I inside the groundwater contaminant plume at the recharge and discharge sites were 67.0 ng/ml and ∼8.3 × 10 11 atoms/liter, and 32.4 ng/ml and ∼2.9 × 10 11 atoms/liter, respectively, with positive correlations between iodine, 14 C (0.82), and tritium (0.87). Maximum total iodine concentrations for in-plume, recharge-site sands and discharge-site peats were 190.1 µg/kg and 14100 µg/kg, respectively. 129 I analyses on these same samples showed concentrations of 2.3 × 10 7 and 6.4 × 10 9 atoms/g of soil, respectively. K D values (concentration on porous medium/concentration in co-existing water) calculated from the contaminant plume data for 127 I and 129 I were 1.3 and 1.6 l/kg, respectively, at the recharge site and 486 and 93 l/kg, respectively, at the discharge area, indicating that both stable and radio-iodine are preferentially sorbed to the organic rich, aquifer materials at the discharge sites. Incremental leach experiments on these same geologic materials have borne out these differences, with 127 I being more strongly sorbed than 129 I, probably as the result of kinetically controlled sorption mechanisms and the differing residence times of stable and radio-iodine in this hydrologic regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it