D‐lactate‐induced neurotoxicity in calves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
D‐lactic acidosis occurs as a complication of short‐bowel syndrome in humans and in a variety of other gastrointestinal disorders in monogastrics and ruminants. It is associated with signs of impaired central nervous system (CNS) function including ataxia and coma. The objective of this experiment was to determine if either acidification of nervous tissue or D‐lactic acid is responsible for decreased neurological function. Eight Holstein calves (32 ± 11 d) were surgically catheterized with indwelling intravenous jugular and atlanto‐occipital space cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) catheters and infused for 6 h in random order with iso‐molar DL‐lactic acid (DL‐LA), L‐lactic acid (L‐LA), hydrochloric acid (HCl) or saline. DL‐LA induced ataxia after 4 h of infusion and produced the greatest obtunding of CNS function (at 7 h, score 8.0 ± 0.4), whereas, the other infusions caused neither ataxia nor scores over 1.5 (p < 0.01 from DL‐LA). After 6 h, DL‐LA induced significantly less acidemia than HCl (pH 7.13 ± 0.06 and 7.00 ± 0.04, base excess −16 ± 1 and −23 ± 3 mmol/l, bicarbonate 11 ± 1 and 8 ± 1 mmol/L respectively, all p < 0.01), but greater than L‐LA and saline (p < 0.01). CSF changes followed a similar but less pronounced pattern. Although HCl infusion produced a severe acidemia and CSF acidosis, only minor effects on neurological function were evident suggesting that D‐lactate has a direct neurotoxic effect that is independent of acidosis. Conversely, L‐LA produced only minor neurological changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".