MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981072776 · doi:10.1055/s-2005-915203

Patient-Reported Donor-Site Morbidity Following Anterolateral Thigh Free Flaps

2005· article· en· W1981072776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgerySeromaWeaknessMedial compartment of thighWound dehiscenceDehiscenceThighFasciaFree flapRetrospective cohort studyComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated donor-site morbidity (retrospective chart review and followup questionnaire) in patients following reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh free flap. Twenty-one flaps were performed in 20 consecutive patients (mean age: 45.0 +/- 3.8 years). Primary wound closure was obtained in 52.4 percent. The perforators were intramuscular in 68 percent and septocutaneous in 32 percent. The early complications included infection (n = 2), wound dehiscence (n = 2), delayed healing (n = 8), and seroma (n = 1). Wound healing took 4.5 +/- 0.7 weeks, and leg weakness resolved completely (n = 13) by 6.6 +/- 2.0 weeks. More chronic complications (n = 19) included weakness (n = 5), pain/tightness (n = 6), contour deformity (n = 14), muscle herniation (n = 6), and unsatisfactory scar appearance (n = 6). No statistically significant differences existed in aesthetics or healing between wound-closure groups, nor in pain or weakness between perforator groups. Pain and weakness were significantly related to sacrifice of the deep fascia from the thigh through its elevation in the flap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it