MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981118418 · doi:10.3138/ctr.152.32

“The first time I put on a Maggie Smith ...”: The Role of Costuming in the Artistic Process of Actresses at the Stratford Shakespeare Festival

2012· article· en· W1981118418 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sara Topham, Marlis Schweitzer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtSketchVisual artsClothingAestheticsPerformance artArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the role of costuming in the lives of actresses at the Stratford Shakespeare Festival. Although there have been numerous sociological studies of the role of clothing in women's lives, few of these have examined the complex, shifting relationship that develops between actors and their costumes, from first sketch to fittings to opening night and beyond. Taking a cue from recent investigations of how rehearsal environments and other offstage spaces affect theatre artists in unexpected, even surprising ways, this article weaves together three conversations with actresses from the Stratford Shakespeare Festival (Lucy Peacock, Andrea Runge, Sara Topham) to better highlight the similarities as well as the differences in the three women's lived experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207