Allograft Airway Fibrosis in the Pulmonary Milieu: A Disorder of Tissue Remodeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) is thought to be a form of chronic allograft rejection. However, immunosuppressive therapy is not effective once fibrosis has developed. We hypothesize that disordered tissue remodeling is a mechanism for the pathogenesis of OB. We examined allograft airway fibrosis in an intrapulmonary tracheal transplant model of OB. Allograft airways were completely obliterated at day 21 by fibrotic tissue; however, tissue remodeling continued thereafter, as demonstrated by the change of collagen deposition density, shift from type I to type III collagen, shift from fibroblasts to myofibroblasts and shift of expression profiles and activities of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). We then used a broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor, SC080, to attempt to manipulate tissue remodeling. Administration of the MMP inhibitor from day 0 to day 28 reduced airway obliteration, without inhibiting T-cell activation. MMP inhibition from day 14 to day 28 showed similar effects on airway obliteration. MMP inhibition from day 21 to day 35 did not reverse the airway obliteration, but significantly reduced the collagen deposition, type III collagen and myofibroblasts in the lumen. We conclude that tissue remodeling plays a critical role in the development and maintenance of fibrosis after transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".