MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Region-specific changes of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV in the mouse brain following chronic morphine treatment

2005· article· en· W1981124812 on OpenAlexaff
Kumar V.S. Nemmani, Jasmin Lalonde, Jeffrey S. Mogil

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyColocalizationCREBProtein kinase AHippocampusMorphineNeuroplasticityCalcium-binding proteinBiologyCalciumNeurosciencePhosphorylationCell biologyMedicineTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we examined changes in expression of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) in the mouse brain following chronic morphine treatment. Double immunohistochemical staining showed strong colocalization of CaMKIV with mu-opioid receptors. Chronic treatment with morphine produced an increase in expression of CaMKIV and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB) in the CA3 region of the hippocampus, whereas a decrease in CaMKIV and pCREB expression was observed in the caudate putamen. Interestingly, chronic morphine induced a decrease in protein expression of CaMKIV in the basolateral amygdale and the primary somatosensory cortex without any concomitant changes in pCREB. These findings suggest that CaMKIV-dependent signaling may play a role in chronic morphine-induced neuroplasticity in a brain region-specific manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207