Relativistic many-body calculations of atomic properties in Pd-like ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wavelengths, transition rates, and line strengths are calculated for the 85 possible multipole transitions between the excited 4p 6 4d 9 4f, 4p 6 4d 9 5l, 4p 5 4d 10 4f, and 4p 5 4d 10 5l states and the ground 4p 6 4d 10 state in Pd-like ions with the nuclear charges ranging from Z = 47 to 100. Relativistic many-body perturbation theory (RMBPT), including the Breit interaction, is used to evaluate energies and transition rates for multipole transitions in hole–particle systems. This method is based on the relativistic many-body perturbation theory, agrees with MCDF calculations in lowest order, includes all second-order correlation corrections, and includes corrections from negative energy states. The calculations start from a [Zn]4p 6 4d 10 Dirac–Fock potential. First-order perturbation theory is used to obtain intermediate-coupling coefficients, and second-order RMBPT is used to determine the matrix elements. The contributions from negative-energy states are included in the second-order multipole matrix elements. The resulting transition energies and transition rates are compared with experimental values and with results from other recent calculations. Trends of the transitions rates for the selected multipole transitions as function of Z are illustrated graphically. The Z dependence of the energy splitting for all triplet terms of the 4p 6 4d 9 4f and 4p 6 4d 9 5l configurations are shown for Z = 47–100. PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ar, 31.15.Md, 32.70.Cs, 32.30.Rj, 31.25.Jf
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".