MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981215977 · doi:10.1021/ef9008955

Constant-Pressure Technique for Gas Diffusivity and Solubility Measurements in Heavy Oil and Bitumen

2010· article· en· W1981215977 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThermal diffusivityDiffusionConstant (computer programming)ChemistryThermodynamicsSolubilityMass diffusivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Gaseous diffusionMolecular diffusionChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified pressure decay method has been designed and tested for more reliable measurements of molecular diffusion coefficients of gases into liquids. Unlike the conventional pressure decay method, the experimental setup has been designed such that the interface pressure and consequently the dissolved gas concentration at the interface are kept constant. This is accomplished by continuously injecting the required amount of gas into the gas cap from a secondary supply cell to maintain the pressure constant at the gas−liquid interface. The pressure decay is measured in the supply cell. The advantage of the new technique is that, assuming the diffusion coefficient to be constant, a simple analysis allows determination of the equilibrium concentration and diffusion coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it