MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981217605 · doi:10.1021/jp048616o

Coil−Globule Transition of Pyrene-Labeled Polystyrene in Cyclohexane:  Determination of Polymer Chain Radii by Fluorescence

2004· article· en· W1981217605 on OpenAlexaff
Susana Piçarra, Jean Duhamel, А.А. Федоров, J. M. G. Martinho

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrenePolystyreneFluorescenceMonomerCyclohexanePolymerChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChromatographyOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coil−globule transition of a polystyrene chain ( M w = 113 000, M w / M n = 1.03) randomly labeled with a pyrene derivative was studied in cyclohexane under dilute conditions by fluorescence. The coil−globule transition temperature was found to be around 25 °C from the presence of a break point in the pyrene excimer-to-monomer fluorescence intensity ratio plot with temperature. Analysis of the pyrene monomer fluorescence intensity decays with the fluorescence blob model modified to consider the presence of ground-state pyrene pairs allowed for the determination of the chain radii at several temperatures between 12 and 50 °C and confirmed the occurrence of a coil−globule transition. Fluorescence was found to be a reliable technique for studying the coil−globule transitions in dilute solutions of low-molecular-weight polymers where stable globules exist without the interference of polymer aggregates in a large temperature interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207