Biological and Pathological Study of Prostate Cancer at Localized Stage in Western Algeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:Toshow the contribution of the pathological examination, associated with prostatic specific antigen (PSA), in the early detection of prostate cancer in Western Algeria. Methodology:This study focused on 160 cases, old between 50-80 years, with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and carried out in urology hospitals in western Algeria during the period from 2007 to 2011. Tumor stage, PSA, Gleason score and the degree of tumor differentiation were analyzed. Results:135 patients, with a poor prognosis and a Gleason score > 8 index of incurable malignant aggression, have not been the subject of this study. But the other 35 patients were candidates because they had a favorable prognosis with a localized stage that could be curable. Gleason score was between 5-6 in 5 patients with TPSA 10 ng / ml at differential stage, score of 7 in 10 patients with TPSA between 10-20 ng / ml atmoderately differentiated stage and finally a score of 8 in 20 patients with TPSA between 20,1-50 ng / ml at apoorly differentiated stage. Conclusion:There is a strong correlation between TPSA, Gleason score and the degree of tumor differentiation. Biological and pathological prognosis, established early, can reduce tumor progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".