MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981267303 · doi:10.1145/1132736.1132748

Scénarios transactionnels sur internet

2006· article· fr· W1981267303 on OpenAlexaff
Claudine Bonneau, Pierre-Léonard Harvey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisappointmentThe InternetComputer scienceUsabilityTask (project management)Field (mathematics)Action (physics)World Wide WebOrder (exchange)Human–computer interactionEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even though usability research done in the past 10 years have contributed to the design of more easy-touse websites, few methods exist for the analysis of ressources deployed by user performing a task on Internet. In this paper we explain how Abraham Moles' generalized cost method can be adapted to Internet usages field in order to take into consideration the disappointment, uncertainty and mental efforts taking place during the online experience. Our aim is to guide the developers by providing a more comprehensive description of the action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUsability and User Interface DesignFrench-language works237,207