MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981283224 · doi:10.1177/0021955x06063514

The Effects of Exfoliated Nano-clay on the Extrusion Microcellular Foaming of Amorphous and Crystalline Nylon

2006· article· en· W1981283224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Plastics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocompositeExtrusionNylon 6Amorphous solidComposite materialNucleationTransmission electron microscopyPlastics extrusionNano-Supercritical fluidPolymerNanotechnologyCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article demonstrates the effect of exfoliated nano-clay on the microcellular foam processing of amorphous and crystalline nylon. Amorphous and crystalline nylon 6 nanocomposites are prepared using a twin-screw extruder. The exfoliated nanocomposite structures are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Nylon and its nanocomposites are foamed in extrusion using supercritical CO 2 . Subsequently, the cell morphologies of nylon and its nanocomposite foams are investigated. It appeared that the nano-clay not only enhanced cell nucleation, but also suppressed cell deterioration during the microcellular foaming of nylon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it