Bibliographic record
Abstract
Figure des plus importantes dans le champ des études littéraires et culturelles aux États-Unis, Gayatri Spivak propose dans sa lecture provocante du mythe ovidien de Narcisse et d'Écho une nouvelle éthique, une nouvelle manière de penser la notion même de responsabilité. Sa lecture privilégie la figure d'Écho qu'elle interprète comme une figure allégorique complexe qui allégorise la condition du sujet post-colonial ainsi que la condition et la responsabilité du critique post-colonial. L'article se concentre sur la lecture que fait Spivak des réponses d'Écho et plus précisément sur la " différance " que Spivak remarque dans ces réponses et qu'elle propose comme une nouvelle forme de résistance éthique qui met en question les notions de responsabilité et de " différance ". Il essaie également de montrer que la réponse critique de Spivak elle-même peut être réinterprétée dans la perspective de cette " différance " résistante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".