Scaling the influence of topographic heterogeneity on intertidal benthic communities: alternate trajectories mediated by hydrodynamics and shading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scale-dependent influence of environmental complexity has become a central issue in ecology. We quantified the impact of artificial reefs on community characteristics (biomass, density) and on individual mussel growth, and we tested the relative importance of physical processes (i.e. flow velocity, substratum temperature) as intermediate factors mediating the scale-dependent influence of topographic heterogeneity on benthic communities. Twelve concrete reefs (cylinders) of 3 different sizes (52, 76 and 115 cm) were placed on randomly selected sites along a rocky intertidal platform. The area around each reef and 4 control sites were divided into 24 sampling cells (6 orientation and 4 distance categories). Hydrodynamic patterns around reefs and control sites were determined using the dissolution of plaster cylinders. Flow velocity was simulated around reefs using a finite-element hydrodynamic model. Substratum temperature was also measured. The biomass and density of benthic community adjacent to the reefs was sampled using 10 10 cm quadrats before and 1 yr after installation. Growth of individual Mytilus edulis attached to experimental panels was measured. A flow index revealed a strong scale-dependent gradient of decreasing water motion intensity with distance from the reefs, and the hydrodynamic model showed a reduction of flow velocity on the downstream side of large reefs. Substratum temperature was lower closer to reefs, and shaded areas increased with reef size. Maximum M. edulis biomass was around large reefs, while the biomasses of other dominant species were not positively influenced by reef size. Biomass and density patterns close to the reefs were significant only around large reefs, with the downstream side having the lowest M. edulis biomass. Growth of M. edulis decreased significantly with distance away from the reefs. Biomass patterns were best explained by the flow velocity around the large reefs (R 2 = 0.27), while mussel growth was best correlated with substratum temperature close to the medium reefs (R 2 = 0.66). Our study shows that the spatial structure of the benthic community studied and its scaling with topographic heterogeneity depends on dominant mediating physical factors (i.e. hydrodynamic processes or substratum temperature).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".