MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Can Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping?

2001· article· en· W1981307941 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence E. Hart, Norman Gledhill

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematocritSoluble transferrin receptorErythropoietinIron deficiencyBlood samplingInternal medicinePlaceboSerum ironAnemia of chronic diseaseEndocrinologyHemoglobinGastroenterologyAnemiaPathologyIron status

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birkeland KI, Stray-Gundersen J, Hemmersbach P, Hallen J, Haug E, Bahr R. Effects of rhEPO administration on serum levels of sTfR and cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:1238–1243. ObjectiveCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? To assess the use of soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) as an indicator of doping with recombinant erythropoietin (rhEPO) in male athletes. DesignCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? Randomized controlled double-blinded 4-week intervention and 4-week follow-up. Participants were matched in pairs for sport and training level. SettingCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? University research center, Oslo, Norway. ParticipantsCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? 20 healthy, well-trained male athletes (mean age, 24 y) from endurance sports volunteered to participate. Inclusion criteria were normal blood values (hematocrit, 38% to 45% and serum ferritin, 25 to 200 μg/L) and no risk factor for cardiovascular disease. InterventionCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? A baseline medical examination included blood and urine sampling and a maximal exercise test on a bicycle ergometer. One of each matched pair of participants was then randomly assigned to 5,000 U (181 to 232 U/kg/wk) rhEPO (Recormon, Boehringer Mannheim GmbH) or placebo (1 mL NaCl 9 g/L) subcutaneously 3 times/wk for 30 days or until hematocrit reached ≥50% in the EPO group. Both groups were given a liquid oral iron supplement (270 mg/d Fe2+). Main outcome measuresCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? Blood samples for the quantification of hemoglobin, sTfR, ferritin, and EPO were obtained 3 times/wk during the intervention, and daily for 5 days, then twice weekly during the 4-week follow-up. Serum sTfR concentration was measured by immunoassay (Orion Diagnostica). Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2 max) and time to exhaustion were measured postintervention, and weekly through the follow-up period. Main resultsCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? Hematocrit increased from a mean of 42.7% at baseline to ≥50% by the fifth day after treatment in all EPO-treated participants, but did not change in the control group. Mean serum levels of sTfR increased in the EPO group from 3.1 (SD, 0.9) to 6.3 (2.3) mg/L (p < 0.001) by 1 day posttreatment. The increase lasted for 2 weeks after treatment then returned progressively to baseline over the next 2 weeks. sTfR did not change in the placebo group. At the end of treatment, individual values were significantly greater than mean baseline values (all participants) for 8 of 10 men in the EPO group and for none in the control group. Mean V̇O2 max increased more from baseline to 1 day posttreatment for the EPO group than the controls (4.9 [3.2] vs. 0.6 [1.9] mL/kg/min increase; p < 0.003) and remained higher through the follow-up. Both groups increased time to exhaustion by 1 day posttreatment (EPO group: 12.8 [1.0] to 14.0 [1.4] min; p < 0.0001; and controls: 13.1[1.5] to 13.3 [1.5] min; p = 0.04). ConclusionCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? Serum levels of sTfR may be used as an indirect marker of supranormal erythropoiesis up to 1 week after administration of rhEPO. The effects of rhEPO administration on maximal oxygen uptake and increased time to exhaustion lasted at least 2 weeks longer than elevated blood levels of sTfR. Source of funding: Norwegian Olympic Committee and Confederation of Sports, Boehringer Mannheim, and Nycomed Pharma AS. For article reprint: K. I. Birkeland, Hormone Laboratory, Aker University Hospital, N-0514 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] CommentaryCan Elevated Serum sTfR Levels Be Used To Indicate rhEPO Doping? The study by Birkeland et al. is well designed and carefully conducted. Although the purpose of the investigation was to examine a technique that might detect rhEPO use, the study is also important because it is the first randomized placebo-controlled investigation to document increases in V̇O2max and time to exhaustion resulting from rhEPO administration in well-trained endurance athletes. Use of rhEPO is generally acknowledged to confer a large advantage in endurance performance. Although its use by athletes has been banned, there is presently no effective detection technique. The use of sTfR to detect rhEPO abuse was proposed by Gareau et al., 1 and although the present study confirms their findings, it also provides some important qualifications. Birkeland et al. found that the serum level of sTfR may be used as an indirect marker of rhEPO abuse for up to 1 week following rhEPO administration. The concurrent iron supplementation taken by both the experimental and the control participants (which is probably what the athletes would do) was probably the reason that the observed difference in sTfR between the groups was less than that reported by Gareau et al. Birkeland et al. also found a substantial performance advantage for at least 2 weeks beyond the time that rhEPO use could be detected. Thus a normal value of sTfR in a doping control test would not rule out recent rhEPO use. Further, in 2 out of the 10 subjects, the level of sTfR never did increase significantly above baseline levels, and several days after cessation of rhEPO treatment only 5 of the 10 subjects exceeded the sTfR cut-off level proposed for detection. Thus testing for sTfR lacked sensitivity and specificity for detecting rhEPO abuse and, as with any currently available technique for detecting rhEPO, it would only be useful in random out-of-competition testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of Sport MedicineSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207