Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cet article examine le rapport difficile que les sociétés entretiennent avec leur passé et les dangers de son écriture. Il évoque la mémoire saturée, une mémoire instrumentalisée, révisée en fonction des besoins du moment, qui pourrait bien être une des formes perverties de l’oubli. Parmi le silence, le refoulement, la banalisation ou au contraire les cérémonies, les phénomènes historiques engendrent et bousculent les symboles mémoriels. Pourquoi le passé réémerge-t-il et comment ? Pourquoi et comment a-t-il été modifié ? Les historiens n’ont plus le monopole de la lecture et de l’interprétation du passé, et il est important d’étudier aujourd’hui quelques modalités de transformation de ce dernier, de dilution des responsabilités, et la façon dont les bourreaux d’hier peuvent se penser en victimes aujourd’hui.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".