MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W198133752

Predation by the exotic cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi on the zooplankton community of Lake Ontario.

2001· dissertation· en· W198133752 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kerry N. McPhedran

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZooplanktonPredationEcologyCladoceraBranchiopodaEnvironmental scienceGeographyFisheryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ponto-Caspian cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi (fishhook waterflea) was first discovered in Lake Ontario in 1998. In 1999, it had spread to 5 Finger Lakes in upper New York State and to upper and lower Lake Michigan. By 2001, it was found in western Lake Erie. Cercopagis was transported to North America in ballast water of a transoceanic shipping freighter. A survey of zooplankton community composition of Lake Ontario was made to assess the impact of Cercopagis predation. The relative abundance of zooplankton species of Lake Ontario has not changed from the early 1980's. However, Cercopagis has affected the species community composition through decreased abundances of total rotifers and major crustacean species such as Bosmina longirostris, Daphnia retrocurva and Diacyclops thomasi. Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine possible prey species of Cercopagis. Cercopagis is able to prey upon the rotifer Asplanchna priodonta and the cladocerans Bosmina longirostris, Daphnia retrocurva, Ceriodaphnia lacustris, Scapheloberis kingi, Moina micrura and Leptodora kindtii. In situ field experiments were conducted to assess natural zooplankton community impacts. Four different experiments failed to detect significant differences between control and predator treatments, thus predatory effects of Cercopagis were not apparent. Lack of predatory events may be attributed to experimental design. Problems that may have affected results include improper light levels, animal stress, mutual interference by Cercopagis individuals, and mortality of experimental Cercopagis. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-06, page: 1475. Adviser: Hugh MacIsaac. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→