MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981386424 · doi:10.1142/s0219199704001252

VERTEX OPERATOR REPRESENTATIONS OF QUANTUM TORI AT ROOTS OF UNITY

2004· article· en· W1981386424 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuly Billig, Kaiming Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsMathematicsVertex operator algebraVertex (graph theory)TorusOperator (biology)Lie algebraOperator algebraPure mathematicsCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldCurrent algebraJordan algebraGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Lie algebra, we add the center c1 (and the outer derivation d1) to the quantum torus [Formula: see text] to give the extended torus Lie algebra [Formula: see text] (and [Formula: see text] respectively). Before the present paper, only some level 1 vertex operator representations for some [Formula: see text] (and [Formula: see text]) were constructed. In this paper, we first give vertex operator representations for [Formula: see text] where I is an arbitrary index set. By embedding some [Formula: see text] into [Formula: see text], we obtain a series of higher level vertex operator representations for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Most of these vertex operator representations yield irreducible highest weight modules over these [Formula: see text]. Also their character formulas follow directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Contemporary MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207