MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981424759 · doi:10.1080/09537280802571613

Integration of production and shipping planning: a co-operative approach

2008· article· en· W1981424759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProduction Planning & Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction planningScheduling (production processes)Production scheduleProduction (economics)Operations researchDoorsDecision support systemScheduleComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Process managementOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article deals with the integration of the production planning and the shipping planning processes in a real company within a just-in-time environment. Perfect integration between production and shipping is needed because 2500 m3 of products are daily sent to many different destinations using few outgoing doors. Most existing papers focus on the scheduling aspects alone, and assume that a product is shipped to a single destination. We propose a decision support system (DSS) to schedule simultaneously the production and the semi-trailers used for shipping. This DSS shares the decision between the user and a computer, and focuses on the organisational aspect of scheduling. This DSS creates incrementally a solution by considering successively the critical aspects and the criteria of each actor. This original integration approach is tested on the industrial case and compared to more classical approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it