MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981424759 · doi:10.1080/09537280802571613

Integration of production and shipping planning: a co-operative approach

2008· article· en· W1981424759 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Baptiste, Éric Alsène, R. Gaudimier

Bibliographic record

VenueProduction Planning & Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction planningScheduling (production processes)Production scheduleProduction (economics)Operations researchDoorsDecision support systemScheduleComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Process managementOperations managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article deals with the integration of the production planning and the shipping planning processes in a real company within a just-in-time environment. Perfect integration between production and shipping is needed because 2500 m3 of products are daily sent to many different destinations using few outgoing doors. Most existing papers focus on the scheduling aspects alone, and assume that a product is shipped to a single destination. We propose a decision support system (DSS) to schedule simultaneously the production and the semi-trailers used for shipping. This DSS shares the decision between the user and a computer, and focuses on the organisational aspect of scheduling. This DSS creates incrementally a solution by considering successively the critical aspects and the criteria of each actor. This original integration approach is tested on the industrial case and compared to more classical approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProduction Planning & ControlSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207