Poza wspólną historią. Historycznoliterackie uwagi na mar ginesieemigracyjnej polonistycznej dydaktyki / BEYOND COMMON HISTORY: THE DIDACTICS OF POLISH STUDIES ABROAD FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A HISTORIAN OF POLISH LITERATURE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Teaching Polish literature in translation at the University in Vancouver constitutes for the author a point of departure for deliberations on the cultural history of Polish literature. Teaching students of various cultural backgrounds make the author realize the inadequacy of many notions of posteolonial discourses in reference to Polish culture. Despite entering into incessant dialogues with the culture of the so called West, Polish literature is nevertheless marginalized by the West; as such, imperialistic discourse does not constitute for it an appropriate reference in educational practices aimed at international students. Didactic solutions based on appeals to processes of familiarizing Poles with their own history and literature (and national values transmitted by them) despite the censorship of the Polish People’s Republic provide a guidance to study of (inter)relationships between literature, culture, and politics and their roles in building a national “structures of feelings”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".